3.7.3 3.7.4 3.8 4 4.1 4.2 1 1.1 1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.2.5 1.2.6 1.3 1.4 1.4.1 2 2.1 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.2 The Rights of Property,Things, and Possession as Positive Interests Comments [5] Positivism: “The explanation of legal propositions from the consciousness of law is false. For this consciousness is itself controlled by the interest in society or the interests in a class, which are ultimately determinative for it.” Re late d I s sue s : The Consciousness of Law Legislation, and the Application of Law Law: Concepts and the Interpretation of Law Interpretation of Norms De r römi sche Obl i gat i onsb eg r i f f I & I I The Facts to which Law should Correspond Fictions and the Determination of the Law: The Will-theory in its Different Guises The Monarch’s Will in the Monarchical State The Will of Parliament in a Parliamentary State The “Will of the State”:The Constitutionally Indifferent Will-theory Law as a Machinery Fuelled by Emotions The Will-theory’s Abolition of Jurisprudential Fundamentals Some Observations on the Critique of Hägerström’s Studies of Roman Law Historicism and Reification of Legal Concepts: Problems The Ultimate Principal Premiss of Legal Positivism - Factual Veracity Interdependency between the Will-theory (Positivism) and Unrealistic Constructions Cas e Study :The Promise - Its Binding Power according to, on the one hand, Roman Law and, on the other, Natural Law Rights and Duties, Fundamental Categories of Modern Jurisprudence Obligatio, Obligare and Obligatus, and Vinculum Iuris Dominium: The Supremacy over the Species of a Thing The Systematic Relationship between Obligatio and Dominium The Theories of Rights and Duties of Natural Law and Modern Jurisprudence: Summary and Conclusion An Unfinished Scientific Project: Legal Positivism a ca l l f o r s c i e n t i f i c p u r i t y 17 The Will-theory Part VI 361 362 366 369 370 371 375 375 377 380 380 381 382 383 384 385 387 391 392 396 397 399 401 402 405 407
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjYyNDk=