RB 65

a ca l l f o r s c i e n t i f i c p u r i t y 15 Boström’s Use of Teleological (Evaluative) Standpoints in his Theoretical Philosophy Evaluations,Values, and Science with Reference to Knowledge and Truth Confusion of Value for Knowledge: Effects Hägerström’s Refutation of ObjectivisticValue Theory Cas e Study: “On the Truth of Moral Propositions” Unsolved Problems in Objectivistic Moral Philosophy Evolution Supernatural Reality: A Supernatural Will Hägerström’s Critique of Kant’s View Metaphysical Defense The Actual Origin of Morality and Customs The Reification of Norms: Religious Influences and Ideas The Determination of Moral Truths Duty and Obligation - Feelings The Foreign Element TheValue-objectivistic Redefinition of Truth: A Self-contradiction Legal Significance The Possibility of Establishing Moral Obligations Summary and Conclusions:The Epistemological Futility of an Objectivistic Moral Theory Addenda: Is it Possible to refute Hägerström’s Moral Theory? I nte rnal Vi ew - Exte rnal Vi ew, Practical and Theoretical Consequences Limi tat ion of the Reach of any Ethical Sci ence Practical Importance. Moral Program. Naïve Idealism? Tran s i t i on f rom Moral Ph i lo sophy to Legal Ph i lo s ophy and Theory Häge r ström’s Pe r spe ct ive: Philosophical and Historical, External and Genetic Philosophy and Jurisprudence Separated - a New Role for the Philosophy of Law Definition of the Range and Scope of Jurisprudence An Introductory Definition of Natural Law: “… natural law, i.e. merely abstractly conceived, but unrealized law” Reasons for the Critique of Natural Law Are Natural Law and the Metaphys i c s of Law Dead ? 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.2.1 2.3 3 3.1 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5.1 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 4 5 5.1 6 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3.1 2 251 253 256 259 261 262 263 265 266 267 270 271 273 274 275 277 278 279 280 282 284 286 287 289 292 292 294 297 299 302 308 Legal Science: “Quid Saulus inter Prophetas?” Part V

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjYyNDk=