c o n t e n t s 14 8. 3. 4 Distrust of jurists 8. 3. 5 Rejection despite an attempt to compromise 8. 3. 6The legislative offensive continues 1911.The round of submitting opinions 8. 3. 7The bill of 1911. Section 23 struck from the proposal for an act on collective agreements 8. 3. 8A third rejection by the left 8. 4 Summary 1885-1914 8. 4. 1The content and legal foundation of employment? 8. 4. 2The interaction between the contract of employment and collectivism? 9 Integration of unions and a separate contract of employment 1915-30 9. 1 1915-1920.Trade unions accepted as legal persons 9. 2The judiciary.The binding force of collective agreements and case law intentions 9. 3 Swedish legal writing 1885-1930. An inadequate means for making labour law Nordling Chydenius Björling Hasselrot Undén Wikander Ekeberg The doctrine concluded 9. 4Attempt at legislation on the basis of the collective agreement 9. 4. 1 The proposal of the National Board of Health andWelfare 1916 9. 4. 2A central board for voluntary arbitration 1920 9. 5 Master and servant, industrial democracy or an extended obligation for industrial peace ? 1921-1926 9. 5. 1The Master-Servant Statute abolished 1926 9. 5. 2 Social Democratic proposals concerning industrial democracy 1923-24 9. 6 Liberals urge labour law legislation 1926-1928 9. 6. 1The debate before the 1928 legislation.The sources 9. 6. 2The supporters: industrial peace, the nature of things, custom, collective agreements and jurist judges 9. 6. 3 Opposition The nature of things and established, accepted customs? Drawing a boundary around protected legal disputes? An impartial labour court? 9. 6. 4The debate of 1926-28 summarised 9. 7The stage is set for the Swedish Labour Court 210 211 213 218 220 224 224 227 229 229 233 234 235 236 236 238 240 243 245 246 248 248 250 252 255 258 264 268 269 277 279 281 283 286 287
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjYyNDk=