servant’s open ended duty of subordination and the master’s duty of care. However, there seems to be a lot of support for the reservation made by Schmidt and other scholars that the situation in the latter half of the19th century was“extremely unclear”.DidWinroth clear the air? p a r t 1 i i , c h a p t e r 3 106 cont i nu i ty and cont ract Historical Perspectives on the Employee’s Duty of Obedience in Swedish Labour Law h
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjYyNDk=