Akademisk avhandling för filosofie doktorsexamen vid Stockholms universitet 1994. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of History, StockholmUniversity, S-106 91 Stockholm. Abstract The subject of this thesis is all preserved secular statutes in Sweden from 1350 to 1500, with the exception of city privileges and statutes. The formal changes in these statutes and their contents are analyzed. A thorough investigation of the relationship of the statutes and their influence on the Swedish National Law of King Magnus Eriksson from approximately 1350 and the National Law of King Christopher from 1442 is made. The aim of this study is to investigate how the royal power (Sw. kungamakten) on the one hand and the aristocracy (Sw. högfrälset) on the other used statutory legislation to obtain political or economic power. It also analyzes the consequences of such legislation for the peasants. The statutes are here considered as a contract between the royal power and aristocracy concerning their different claims to political power or their claims to land, yield and farmers. Statutory decisions concerning the relationship between royal power and aristocracy were, to a great extent, incorporated both in the National Law of King Magnus Eriksson and in the Lawof King Christopher. By incorporating these statutes in the national laws, the roval power and aristocracy gained control, regulated their mutual relationships and legitimized their power. The statutory legislation differentiated the heterogeneous mass of peasants. This population was divided into the categories Crown peasants (freeholders, Sw. skattebönder) and peasants of the nobility (tenants, Sw. landbor). Through statutory legislation, the Crown tried to maintain the amount of freeholders (almost 50 % of this population) and to increase its revenue through new taxes. The Crown thus obtained greater control of the freeholders’ land and its cultivators. On the other hand, landlords united and there was therefore less mutual rivalry over the tenants, as the nobles tried to bind them more closely by submitting them to new rent fees. Even so, the Swedish tenants were able to maintain their independence. The balance of power between Crown and nobility, as well as the fact that they shared the peasants between them, ultimately meant that freeholders remained freeholders. Their land became economically sound enough to pay taxes to the Crown and in the long run, the Swedish freeholders obtained unique political power. Key words: royal statutes, national laws, legislation, legitimacy, freeholder’s land, contract, the Crown, Late Middle Ages ISBN 91-85190-51-9 ISSN 0534-2716 (^ Gabriela Bjarne Larsson och Institutet för rättshistorisk forskning Tryck; Bloms Boktryckeri AB Lund 1994 Den på titelbladet avbildade medaljen över Johan Stiernhöök är slagen av Svenska Akademien 1837. Den är graverad av C. M. Mellgren.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjYyNDk=