(224} atfi cjiiis fervam fervamve pro libero in matrimoniumalicui dediflTcCjVel ipfc fiimpfinfec, coipfo libcrcatemdonafTcjdc jus fuumin eos perdidiffe jadicatus fuit.,. ?^^taf<rma^frfoflra(tt1 / oc^ beDin frd(fafottuitieb ocb tallar ^ati frdlfan wao ra: ^ubiMrfrd{3tnaMr fo|irutn bonbe t faOar ^anatrdlfaii tvara/ ^aftvln t^etfdrr fvati fine / ocbt^önfvariii frdf} 0^ alt %t aff t^m tOttlbiV/ Senfus eft : Si dominn^ dixerit 'vernam vel lihertamliberamefjej irfrolihera eloeaverit, perdit jti4 in eantyprout extititejus vel dominus Vel patronus ; neej; enimqucmquamex dolo fiio vel alcerins eum-» damno lociipletari voliierant-i: Sed fi fciens fervomiilier nupfifTec, vcl fervam vir diixifTec, ni(i redempei forent, in tantum acqiiifitum dominis jus imminiierenonpoceranc, quominns etiam ex tali conjiigiorupcrfticibus,morcuofervo, in beffem; fervi incrientemdomini fucccdercnt, quod &faétumfupradiximus, fi (ervns alcerins domini fervamfibi coneuberniojunxilTec, nifi quod tunc etiam fnccefllo in liberos cfTct, hic vero nulla, quod femper libercacemfeqnantur Si vero ex furtivo conciibitnaut illcgicimo liberi elTcnt, iixj cos nihil juris fibi vcl Itrvus vel fervi dominns vindiConjugia Hh
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjYyNDk=